13 Oct
Health insurance lobby attacks reforms
Author: AdminHealth insurance lobby attacks reforms
By Edward Luce in Washington
Published: October 12 2009 17:39 | Last updated: October 12 2009 21:08
The White House and the health insurance industry on Monday descended into open conflict on the eve of a critical Senate vote that could determine the fortunes of Barack Obama’s healthcare reform plans.
Supporters of President Obama accused the health insurance industry of attempted “sabotage” after it issued a report by PwC, which estimated that premiums would rise much faster under the proposed reforms than they would have done otherwise.
The 26-page report marked an abrupt end to the unlikely alliance between Mr Obama and America’s Health Insurance Plans – the main industry lobby group, which has spent about $100m on advertising to support the reforms.
The report estimates that premiums for the average household would rise to $17,200 a year by 2013 under the proposals compared with $15,500 without the reforms. Today’s average annual premium is $12,300.
A spokesman for Max Baucus, chairman of the Senate finance committee, which is to hold a key vote on Tuesday on its $829bn 10-year healthcare reform plan, described the report as a “hatchet job, pure and simple”.
Karen Ignagni, president of AHIP, said the industry was still in favour of bipartisan healthcare reform. But Linda Douglass, White House spokeswoman on healthcare made it clear the administration now saw AHIP as an outright opponent: “On the eve a vote the health insurance industry comes out against a plan which would reduce their profits,” she said.
The report identifies four elements in the “Baucus plan” that it claims would increase costs for average policyholders. These include steps that would reduce the number of people forced to take up health insurance by lowering the fine levied on individuals who declined to take out a policy.
It also highlights proposed taxes on the “Cadillac plans” – the more expensive health insurance plans, amounting to more than $8,000 a year for individuals and $21,000 a year for families. And it also highlights the more than $400bn in cuts to Medicare, the programme for seniors, that would be used to help pay for the subsidies to expand US insurance.
The rancorous split between the White House and the health insurance lobby could make it far tougher for Mr Obama to push through his healthcare reforms. In 1993,
AHIP played a key role in sinking the Clinton administration’s healthcare reform programme when it sponsored the controversial “Harry and Louise” ads that persuaded many Americans that reform would undermine their existing coverage.
Harry and Louise famously switched sides in 2009 to back Mr Obama’s reform efforts. Yet many liberal supporters of Mr Obama alleged that the White House paid too high a price for the support of the health insurance industry, most notably by signalling flexibility over the inclusion of a “public option”, or government insurance plan, which was jettisoned under the Baucus plan.
Tuesday’s vote on the 23-member committee will be a key test of whether Mr Obama can keep conservative Democrats on side.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2009. You may share using our article tools. Please don’t cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.
Possibly Related Posts:
- Could This be the Key Factor Spiking the Rise in ADHD?
- The Gulf BLUE PLAGUE is Evolving
- Gulf Blue Plague Part II: Corexit+Bacteria=Mutated Viruses
- Public Employee Unions Guarantee National Bankruptcy
- Collateral Damage USA: Extremist cells target 350,000 US civilians
Filed under: Health

